“Artificial intelligence reactivates fundamental questions that have long preoccupied philosophers, art theorists, and academics regarding authorship and creativity in artistic production. At the heart of these debates lies the question: who can legitimately claim the status of author of a work of art when AI systems are involved in its creation? Does authorship belong to the artist who conceived the idea (the prompts), selected the outputs, and made curatorial decisions about the final work? Or should we attribute creativity to the AI tool itself, which performs the actual generative labor, drawing on its training and algorithmic processes to produce new results? Or perhaps to its programmers? Moreover, we must consider the role of prior tradition embedded within these systems: the countless artists, writers, and creators whose works were used to train AI models, forming, in essence, the foundation upon which all AI-generated content rests. It compels us to reconsider long-held assumptions about human uniqueness in the creative act and challenges our traditional frameworks for understanding artistic production,” explains Emanuele Arielli, present in Romania for the first time on this occasion.